![]() ![]() The flip-side of that coin being that you'd need to come up with a solution for supplying alternate NAS credentials as part of any automated sync process. To a debatably lesser degree, the same is true even if you don’t keep NAS network drives constantly mapped but still use the same username/password on your NAS as you do on your PC. If you have persistently mapped drives, then malware threats have the potential to affect items in those network shares regardless of sync frequency. If it is too frequent, you could sync corruption, viruses or cryptolocker infections to your backup copy before you notice it. This post contains the robocopy syntax I use including the relevant blurbs from robocopy's help info:īe careful about setting too short of a sync frequency. Additionally, I’m not entirely sure if either /S or /E replicate deletions. ![]() Just an FYI that /S in robocopy does not replicate empty subdirectories. For example, if you had your NAS mapped as a Z: drive, and you wanted to sync from your D:\Photos folder, you would just need to run:Ĭould also do UNC path if you don't map drives By default it only copies changed or new files. If you are willing to a tiny bit of work, you can just use built in command line utility robocopy. That looks like it might be a good solution. I know Windows 10 has a sync capability, but it is not enabled for Windows 10 Home so I need a single solution that I can install on each Windows 10 system. ![]() The software should allow me to set a sync schedule that will check for changes every few minutes. Sync desktop Documents, Pictures and Downloads to H:\desktop_files Sync laptop Documents, Pictures and Downloads to H:\laptop_files The ideal solution will let me select local folders and identify a folder on the mapped drive to sync them to, for example: The files that I want to sync include Documents, Pictures, and Downloads. I map a drive from a QNAP NAS to each system (H:) and would like to be able to automatically sync files I store on the laptop or desktop to the mapped drive. I may be wrong but I'd think you should get somewhere in the same neighborhood through USB 2.0, while not the 100 MB/s you're looking for it's better than the 15-20 you seem to be getting now.I have a laptop that runs Windows 10 Home and a desktop that runs Windows 10 Pro. I'd say that's an expected speed considering my rig is really old. Next I tried Dolphin which is what I used to load my array for the first time, running the same exact test I used with Filezilla I got about 48MB/s. Note that internal moves are pretty rare for me. Honestly I only use it out of laziness, if I'm already moving data from my seedbox to unraid with Filezilla then I will also use it to move internal folders as needed rather than opening dolphin. I've done some testing and something is limiting my Filezilla to about 13MB/s (see image) this test is moving data within unraid from one share to another, I'm not sure why it isn't faster. Dolphin seems to greatly out perform Filezilla on my rig. ![]() I can't speak to Krusader as I haven't used it. Is the limitation in speed related to the smb share? Changing from binhex-Krusader to Krusader docker, fixed the problem not seeing the shares free space.Ĭopying with Krusader show 15-20GB speed, so do ftp with FileZilla. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |